In this study, the authors investigate how different simulation environments affect training of ship command teams, focusing on workload, combat readiness, and situational awareness. Two different simulation platforms were compared (low- and high-fidelity; Emergo Train System and Vulcanus II). The study found that training in a lower fidelity environment can induce stress levels similar to high-fidelity training while being more cost-effective.
The results showed that low-fidelity simulations require fewer resources yet still prepare participants for complex tasks. Higher mental workload was noted in low-fidelity simulations, likely due to a lack of information. Significant differences in combat readiness were observed between the two settings, with the high-fidelity environment perceived as more realistic. Situational awareness (SA) and overall workload exhibited noticeable differences between the environments.
The study recommends a combination of low- and high-fidelity simulations to balance costs and training efficiency. This has practical implications for improving training within both military and civilian sectors.